"When faced with a problem you do not understand,
do any part of it you do understand; then look at it again."
~(Robert A. Heinlein - "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress")

About to comment here for the very first time?
Check Where'd my Comment go?!!! to avoid losing it.
-

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Accident Report - A Work in Progress

Final Update - 00:45 CDT, Sun, 15 Apr 2012 - Phoenix!!!
(This is a work-in-progress, and will be updated whenever I have something new to add).

This really, really sucks, almost beyond my powers of description (which I like to flatter myself as being pretty good).

Sunday, 18 Mar 2012, between 15:30 and 16:00 CDT

While on the Katy Freeway ( I-10, outbound, approaching Blalock ), the left rear tire of my car blew, my car swerved left into an 18-wheeler that was alongside, and I spun out and ended up along the right retaining wall on the overpass above Blalock.

I had heard a load bang, and a noise as if I had driven over something, and then lost control.

The left rear wheel is damaged beyond repair (as is the tire) and the left rear hub and suspension may be bent.

The left (driver's) door is badly damaged and will not open (although the window still functions Ok).

The truck I tangled with appeared to have suffered minor scrapes and dents to the front bumper, at and just back of the right front corner.

When I spun out, a third vehicle mostly managed to avoid major impact, but suffered some damage to its left front fender, just in front of the door.

No one was injured.

At present (20:55 CDT, 18 Mar 2012) my car is at an auto storage lot, awaiting a visit by the insurance people to see what comes next.  My agent's office is just a few blocks from my apartment, so I will be heading his way Monday morning, 19 Mar 2012.

The wrecker driver gave me a lift home and told me that there was a pretty good chance that the insurance people would total it and give me a check for the blue-book value.

He also said that if I didn't want to go looking for a used car (and I surely don't, having neither the time nor the means to do such shopping), I could probably buy it back from the insurance company for a fraction of the check they might award and could maybe find someone (and I definitely do have someone in mind - see $446.99 ) and could maybe get it fixed well enough to be drive-able for the amount that would be left.

We shall see. If that could be managed, I'd have infinitely more trust in the result than I would in a used car I knew nothing at all about, bought under the chaotic circumstances I now find myself in without any means of getting around.

Son -- of -- a -- B*TCH!!!

Update - 16:00 CDT, Mon, 19 Mar 2012:  I walked over to my insurance agent's office this morning, and started the claims process.  He told me that a claims adjuster would get in touch with me, but that ain't happened yet.

I so wanted to tell the adjuster that, as much as possible, I would greatly prefer that my car be made drive-able rather than totaled and replaced by a used car that I could never depend on, and may soon need something that I simply wont be able to pay for.  In my present circumstances, that would be lethal. It really is just as simple as that.

My greatest fear is that may be exactly what is going happen.

Update - Thu, 22 Mar 2012 - Where things stand - Accident Report: Part 2
(This was originally a separate post, now deleted and incorporated into this one.)

At the moment, I'm still waiting to determine if the third (and final part) will be titled "Black Border" or "Phoenix".

The first choice is from a Victorian custom of using stationery and/or envelopes bordered in black to warn the recipient of very bad news inside (often a death notice).

As for the second possibility, I really hope it's not necessary to explain to a reader here that I am not referring to the city in Arizona.

Today is the fourth day after the accident.  I've learned that my car has finally been moved from the storage lot to a place where the insurance claims adjusters will look it over and determine its fate.

I also checked with the place where I would like it repaired, and the manager there said he would have to see the report from the claims adjuster before he could determine if the repairs were feasible (being constrained by safety and liability issues).

So, everything 's still up in the air.

A friend emailed me, "But... it is/was just a car and you're physically OK, and that ain't bad considering."

But, in Houston there ain't no such thing as "just a car".   The lack of one here can really grind you down and just suck the life out of you.

I sure hope I will know more tomorrow.

Update - Sun,  25 Mar 2012 - Well, that "tomorrow" has come and gone, and I still don't know anything new.  Trying to get information out of these people is as much fun as do-it-yourself dental surgery.

Yesterday, I finally sent this email to their claims office (up in Dallas - apparently this very large outfit doesn't have one in the FOURTH LARGEST CITY IN THE UNITED STATES).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"***** ****® wants to communicate with you in the manner that's easiest for you. If you would like to communicate with us via email, you may reply to this communication. Please be sure to include only your claim number in the subject line, so that we can associate your email with your claim."

Well, if that hasn't become abundantly clear by now, that IS the way I'd prefer to communicate.

Playing phone tag with you is extremely difficult for me because of my work schedule, intermittent to non-existent cell-phone reception at work, and hearing that is WAY less than perfect.

Having learned from a lady on Team 22 that a statement I wrote up and gave to my agent had never been sent to you, I emailed a copy to you on your secure email system.

So, as of today (Sat, 24 Mar 2012), where do things stand?

I KNOW the website says "Open" for the status of my claim, but ...

Now that you finally have my car at your facility, has anyone yet had a chance to look it over?

Are you awaiting an opportunity to do so (too many vehicles, and too few people available?)?

I'm not asking the impossible from you, but it would be nice to know what the situation is, and what's going on.

Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And that's the way it is, so far.  I think I've finally gotten the inspiration for my upcoming "...like being nibbled to death by ducks!" post.  :(

(Well, perhaps not. I put up such a post, but I'm not in the right emotional state to do it justice.  It amounted to a scream of pain, so I pulled it. Maybe down the road I can make it work.)

Update 09:50 CDT, Mon, 26 Mar 2012 - Just got this email ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mr Gordan:

I just received your email. The inspection of your vehicle will take place today. We should have it in our system late this afternoon.

If there is anything else you have questions about, please feel free to email or call us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A little earlier this morning, I had forwarded a copy of my inquiry email to my agent, noting ...

  I think I'll pass this along as FYI.

  If you learn that I've dropped dead from heart failure,
  your first thought will be, "He actually got a reply from them."

  :-)

Well, my heart is racing, but the fact that I'm typing this is probably a good sign.
(And, YES, I have noticed that an amazing number of people seem to have difficulty in spelling "Gordon".)

Update - 17:47 CDT, Mon, 26 Mar 2010 - I may have just been killed.
The claims center has finally put something up.  It is an estimate, in which they appear to have totaled it.  No mention whatever of a report that I can take to the shop to see if repairs are feasible.  Can't talk to my agent, his office is already closed. Will have to wait until tomorrow to see what is what, and what can be done.

I'm truly scared to death now.  If it comes to that, how in HELL am I supposed to go used-car shopping when I'm dependent on buses and can barely even walk?

JESUS!!! 

Update - 17:50 CDT, Tue, 27 Mar 2012 - Hopes raised, and then dashed :(
This morning, I revisited that estimate.  While cutting and pasting data from it into a personal file, something I clicked on produced a widget letting me download and save a PDF file of their repair estimate file. Seeing nothing in there that would preclude (because of safety issues) Pep Boys from making the car drive-able again, I printed out a copy of that file and visited Pep Boys on the way home from work. They didn't see any no-no's in there either. This is the "Hopes raised," part

BUT, when I got home, this email awaited me ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good afternoon Mr. Gordon,

I am emailing you, per your request, about your vehicle, 2000 Honda Civic. We typically send the attached letter after we have communicated the information to you verbally over the phone with regard to your vehicle. Since we have not spoken, I am attaching the document at this time.

Unfortunately the vehicle is a total loss and the attached document states the value of your vehicle plus tax, title, and fees, and minus your deductible and assuming there is no lien on your vehicle. The amount payable to you is $4,023.47.

I see your car has been moved to one of our storage free facilities and am wondering if you have gotten all of your personal items from the vehicle? If not, I can provide you with the address to the facility so that you can go by to get your belongings. I will need advance notice if you will be going by the facility as I need to give them authorization for you to access your vehicle on their lot. Also, do you have a clear title of the vehicle?

Once you have gone over the attached document you can call and we can set up a place for you to pick up your settlement. The number you can call to reach us is 866-***-**** ext. *****. We will need to make arrangements to collect the 1) clear Texas Title; 2) your signature on a Power of Attorney (so State Farm can take the vehicle into our name after we pay you); and 3) a copy of your driver's license.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You've probably guessed that was the "... and then dashed." part.

After managing to avoid throwing up again (blood came up in last night's episode, and I certainly don't need a repeat of that), I was able to conjure up this reply ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is your criteria for "total loss"?

The fact that your repair estimate exceeds the Actual Cash Value?

That estimate appears to be what it would take to restore it to at least the level it was at before the accident.

What if I was willing to settle for it just being "useable"; so I could drive it without getting arrested?

WHY am I so relectant to let it go? Because I KNOW that car. I've had it almost 12 years now, and would have infinitely more trust in a drive-able version of it that I would in any used car I could probably find for the amount you're prepared to pay. With such a used car, the first time something major goes out in it, I almost certainly wont have the funds to repair it.

This doesn't even take into account that, at the moment I have NO way to go shopping for a used car, being totally dependent on the buses, and barely able to walk.

That Honda probably has a LOT of life still in it if one is not concerned about trying to make it look new again.

Is there major frame damage that would preclude Pep Boys from being able to make it useable again?

What options remain to me?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, that's where we are at the moment. This thing should finally come to a head pretty soon.

BTW - Who the Hell are the Pep Boys I keep mentioning above? In my post $446.99 (about the radiator replacement in my Honda), I mentioned a "My Mechanic" shop (part of a local chain) that I use a lot, because they are very competent, doing first-rate work at about 3/4 the cost of having it done by a dealer.

A while back, the chain sold most of its locations (including the one I use) to a national chain called Pep Boys. Still the same team, under a new banner, and still just as good. I highly recommend them.

I just hope they eventually get a chance to prove it on my Honda. I'd really love to finish this post with a section called "Phoenix".

Update - 17:20 CDT, Wed, 28 Mar 2012 - Well, it ain't gonna be "Phoenix".
Whether "Black Border" would be appropriate remains to be seen.

I've filled in the settlement value (which had been asterisked out) in the earlier email above. It was $4,023.47, arrived at (from their estimate) by ...

 The amount payable to you was determined as follows:

     Actual Cash Value/base price: $4,682.09
     Plus:       Taxes:            + $292.63
                 Title Fees:        + $35.50
                 Registration Fees:  + $0.00
                 Inspection Fees :  + $13.25
     Less:       Deductible:     - $1,000.00
     Retained Salvage Value           - $n/a
     Total Amount Payable:       = $4,023.47
     Net amount payable to you:    $4,023.47

On one hand, Yes, I can remember when that was real money. My first new car (1967 Volkswagen Beetle, bought in December 1966) was $1699.00 + 4% sales tax. A few used cars afterwards, and then my second new one was a 1980 GMC pickup bought in September 1980 for $5295.00 + all the et-ceteras. Things appear to have changed a bit.

On the other hand, I am surprised that a twelve year old Honda was actually worth that much.

On the way home, I stopped by Pep Boys, talked to the manager, and got his advice on whether I should salvage the car or look for another. His advice appears in the email I sent in reply to this one that awaited me when I got home...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good morning Mr. Gordon,

Your vehicle qualifies as a total loss because the repair costs exceed the value of the vehicle. You have the option of keeping your car, in that case the amount payable to you would be $2,818.83. Texas salvage branding laws will apply. You will need to speak to a qualified repair facility to get the vehicle safely operable. If you have any further questions please feel free to respond back or call at 866-***-**** ext. *****.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I called the manager at Pep Boys, talked with him some more, and finally made a decision. I tried calling the 866 number, but the party had already left for the day, so I sent the following email, which makes my final decision pretty obvious ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I received your reply about the possibility of keeping the car and receiving a lower settlement of $2818.83.

Everyone I've talked to (including the manager of the Pep Boys facility I had in mind for repairing it) recommended accepting the original settlemnt of $4,023.47 and just go looking for another car. My fears about doing that still remain, but that manager offered to check out whatever car I considered.

So, I have decided to accept the $4,023.47.

I tried to phone you (about 16:25; you'd already left).
I'll try again tomorrow (Thu, 29 Mar 2012) when I get home from work
(probably around 15:00 CDT).

To answer your earlier questions:

1) There a few items of mine in the car, but nothing that I'm interested in keeping, and certainly NOT worth the trouble of going out there to retrieve.
So, I do NOT plan on going by there.

2) As for a place where I can pick up my settlement, Why not ***** *****'s office at **** ***** Drive, Suite *, Houston, Tx 77019. He's my agent, and that location is only a few blocks from where I live. Don't forget that this whole mess means I am dependent on the bus for now, and can barely walk.
We can discuss this when I call tomorrow.

3) I DO have clear title to the vehicle (and have managed to find it).
There are NO liens on the car.

4) I have no problem with the Power of Attorney (assuming that you provide the form).

5) Ditto about a copy of my driver's license.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lord! I just hope I haven't managed to come up with a new way of suicide by this decision, but everyone I've talked to seems to feel that my hope of salvaging the Honda is just not realistic, especially when considering the reduced amount of money available for repairs if I choose to keep it.

And, I suppose the literary desire to add a section called "Phoenix" to this post might not be the most rational of reasons to take such a chance with a vehicle that challenged an 18-wheeler - and lost.

You think?!!!

Update - 18:21 CDT, Wed, 04 Apr 2012 - Gamble
Well, I've gone back and forth on whether to salvage the Honda or take the full payout and look for something else. The title of this update is probably a clue as to which way I've been blown this time.

This was my pride & joy when I first got it, almost 12 years ago ...

And this is what it looks like now ...


After requesting copies of the photos taken by the claims adjuster, what I finally got today was these black & white printouts I've just scanned.

This is ***** ****'s definition of "Total Loss"; in their case, meaning costing more to restore it to before-crash status than its fair market value.

But, what would it take to make it drive-able?

That left rear wheel is a lot worse than it looks, as is the tire. The hub it's mounted on is probably bent and very likely the whole left rear suspension may need replacing.

The other problem is the driver-side door.

I couldn't open it at the accident scene, and feared it might have been wedged by impact into the rest of the body shell. I never could get a straight answer to my query if there was any frame damage, but my agent told me that if there had been, I never would have had the option of keeping it.

Just looking at those photos, I'm beginning to wonder.

Note the window in that door. It was all the way down when the accident occurred. Afterwards, before leaving the scene, I was able to roll up that window partway (reaching in from outside the car). In the picture, they have it all the way up and the glass doesn't appear damaged at all.

I'm beginning to suspect that maybe the door lock is just messed up from the impact, and that it may be possible to get that door functioning again. If so, tacking on a driver's side mirror to that door (with sheet-metal screws if necessary) might be enough to make it street legal.

The gamble I've made is to keep the car and accept the lower payout I've already mentioned above (and which should be mailed to me within a few days).

***** **** has agreed to tow the car to the Pep Boys shop and I stopped by there today to give them a heads-up about incoming. They should get it tomorrow, and then I may find out if I'm being delusional about this.

At the moment, I think not.

The bottom line is that searching online for used cars on various sites (including the autotrader.com recommended by the manger at that Pep Boys found a lot of cars in the price range I was looking for, but too damned many of them had over 200,000 miles on them. That's just about when an engine or transmission overhaul can be expected in the very near future.

Had my job not been outsourced in 2004, that Honda would have over a quarter-million miles on it by now (if I had kept it; which I very probably would have). But, that job loss cut my driving way down, resulting in only 110,000 miles on it so far. The engine and transmission are rock-solid and I have much more trust in them than I would have in any used car I've found so far.

Am I certain? Hell NO!!! That's why this update is called "Gamble".

But, I really think it's a good one.

To be continued.

Update - 08:15 CDT, Fri, 06 Apr 2012 - Waiting: A day lost.
That "tomorrow" I mentioned above came and went thusly...

While at work yesterday, I got a message from the Pep Boys manager saying that the car had been delivered to them that morning, but without the key; and they couldn't do anything without it.

By a miracle I had a spare key in my pocket (from a habit I developed after locking myself out of the car once), but my work shift didn't allow me a chance to get it to them until shortly before their closing time of 18:30.

He was non-committal about my speculations on the extent of the damage so far, saying he couldn't really tell anything until they get into it. I'm probably driving him up the wall on this, putting him into an impossible situation where he's trying his level best to avoid even the appearance of promising something he may not be able to deliver.

I plan on going by there this afternoon, by which time they should know more.

That was a long damned day yesterday. There's apparently a big difference between exercise which builds you up and strengthens you and just plain work and toil which only seems to wear you down.

Before I got the IT job I later lost when it was outsourced, I went through over nine months of unemployment, losing the car I had then (a 1994 Dodge Intrepid - "Snake Bit") through repossession just a few weeks before getting that job.

I spent thirteen months without a car, depending on the bus and walking all over the place to get by. I do not recall getting any stronger over that period; just getting more and more ground down. The healing didn't even begin until I got that car (the one that is the subject of this post)

So, just waiting.

Update - 22:30 CDT, Fri, 06 Apr 2012 - Hope.
This afternoon I got a call from the Pep Boys manager, saying that he could probably have the car ready tomorrow.

But, one hitch that will make it take longer is that the check from the insurance company has yet to arrive.

When asked, he told me that $2,300.00 was what it would take to get it back in usable condition. That's for replacing the rear wheel, tire, most of the left rear suspension system, the driver-side door, and realignment.

My speculations on that door turned out to be a lot of wishful thinking (delusional). They did fool with the locking mechanism, but the door truly is wedged into the door frame enough that he's going to have to cut it away.

He wants to go ahead and put a left rear wheel and tire on it (so they can move it around) and he has found a place that has a usable door ("...but it'll be red!" - OKay ...). I told him to go ahead and get those parts (as I can cover that cost now), but the rest of the work should wait until that check has been deposited and cleared.

I confirmed on my account at ***** ****'s website that the check was issued on Apr 4 and that it should be in the mail now, probably arriving on Monday (maybe even as early as Saturday).  He figures that the work can be done in a day (provided that no surprises show up when they have it on their rack for the alignment).

My brother could probably accomplish this for half that amount, but he lives out in the country where no apartment manager would object to the work being done there (I would probably be evicted if I tried that where I now live), he's stronger and in better shape than I am (while I've done major work on cars a long time ago, it would damned near kill me to try it now), he probably has more tools than the Pep Boys location I'm using (compared to the piddling handful I now possess), and has access to all manner of places for the necessary parts.

So, I'm content with the estimate I've gotten. Another factor is that, in this economy, used cars (especially small, economical cars) are at a premium, as are usable parts for them.

Barring any unpleasant surprises, I just may have wheels again by or before the middle of this coming week. It may be a silver Honda Civic with a red door on the driver's side, but that will only make it distinctive. Changing that color will probably not make it onto any priorities list of mine.

Please, God!

Update - 19:00 CDT, Sat, 07 Apr 2012 - $2,300.00 to fix THIS?!!!
Went over to Pep Boys and took a few more pictures ...

Those aren't just smudges below the door handle;  they're linear rips in the metal. I still have difficulty grasping that the door will have to be cut away.

$2,300.00 just to band-aid it. But, you have to trust people sometime. I've had work done by them for a long time now and have never had reason to believe they were anything other than completely honest with me. Behavior does not exist in a vacuum, and I doubt that this manager was suddenly possessed by the Devil and decided that I was his golden opportunity. There's probably a lot that I'm not taking into account on bodywork, fitting a car door into a frame that may need a bit of stretching here and there. In short, appearances may be deceiving here. I simply do not know. I'm going to trust their judgment here.

And, of coarse, the insurance people estimated more than twice that amount to restore the car to its pre-crash status. Things simply cost a lot these days.)

Hopefully, the check should arrive Monday or Tuesday and I can give the go-ahead.

("Are we there yet?" :-)

Update - 06:50 CDT, Tue, 10 Apr 2012 - STILL waiting for the check.
It was Wed, 04 Apr that I met with my agent and decided to keep the car and accept the lower payout.

The page on my account on ***** ****'s website shows that the check was issued that very day. It is less than 300 miles from Dallas to Houston, so WHY (six days later) do I not have it? I'm sure that Pony Express was faster. By the time I get home today, it will be too late to go to the bank and deposit it.

All the same, I think I will stop by Pep Boys on the way home and sign the work order, so they can start as soon as I call and say "Go!". Naturally, I'd feel a lot better about saying that if I was backed up by that check.

Today, hopefully.

Update - 19:30 CDT, Tue, 10 Apr 2012 - Conspiracy Theory.
I suddenly had an epiphany about what is probably going on with that check that is taking so long to get to me.

I just got home about an hour ago, and when trying to phone the claims adjuster, had to settle for someone other than the one handling my case (because the one I wanted to talk to had already gone for the day).

While waiting for her, a recorded announcement warned to wait seven days for the payment to be processed. The one I finally talked to said pretty much the same thing, and to wait until Friday before starting to worry.

That reminded me of an ancient post of mine (An Ode to PayPal..., which was a follow-up to Anatomy of an eBay Transaction...). In Ode, I noted ...
"Although the rapidity with which funds exit my checking account raises hope that lightspeed may NOT be an ultimate barrier, movement in the other direction takes days. They say that banking rules are responsible for this but, tragically, I've gotten a bit cynical in my old age. I can't help thinking that interest on funds they are holding may have a bit to do with it."

I was assured, by several friends who know something of the process, that that is exactly the case.

Almost certainly, that is what is going on here. While that payment is being processed, those funds are still drawing interest.

Mystery solved.

Update - 20:40 CDT, 12 Apr 2012 - Is the US Postal Service really that bad?
Up there I had a nice conspiracy theory all worked out. But, however much I may like it and think that it explains a lot, "It ain't necessarily so."

I finally got the check today. I managed to get home early for once, the mail had arrived early, and there was the check in time for me to catch a bus, go to my bank, deposit it and make the call to the Pep Boys manager, telling him "Go!".

Worse even than taking over a week to get from Dallas to here (a bit under 300 miles), it was sent from Austin (only around 185 miles away). My agent (whom I know and trust) swears that the check went into the mail the very day it was issued (Wed, 04 Apr 2012), therefore taking eight days to go from Austin to Houston.

The water in my apartment complex is billed from Addison, Texas (on the north side of Dallas) and twice my payments to them (sent by mail) were not registered until about 10 or 11 days later (it used to be that two days were pretty typical). After I sent an email tearing the billing company a new one, a very nice lady there noted in her response ...

I do apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you, but the mail service is not what it used to be either. So many post offices have closed down since the 1st of the year and it does take longer for us to receive the mail. (Emphasis mine).

I know that CYA may be involved here, but something about the general tone of her response (of which the above was just a small part) makes me believe her. Is she onto something? I've already heard similar from a few others. Is this yet another thing that has gone into decline since you-know-who came into office?

Anyways, lost amongst the political conjecturing there is the fact that things are finally coming to a head in the great saga of getting wheels again.

More episodes coming up.

Final Update - 00:45 CDT, Sun, 15 Apr 2012 - Phoenix!!!
With any luck, this update should be my last words on this subject. This post has gotten a bit long with all the updates and is downright tedious in places. But, I like the ending. I hope you will too.

I got my car back Saturday afternoon.

I almost had it Friday evening, but for a glitch with the replacement door. The one they found had power windows and power locks. They swapped out the window cranking mechanism from my old door but discovered that the power operated lock could not be worked by the rods used for mechanical lock (original lock was too mangled for reuse) so they had to send out for another door latch, making it impossible to finish the car yesterday.

Today almost got hung up over the most insignificant and nit-picking detail. You may have noticed, in the black and white prints from the insurance people, that no license plates were on the car. They had removed them (probably to prevent them from being liberated while the car was in their lot). They included the plates when the car was delivered to Pep Boys, but they failed to hang on to the fastening screws.

When the Pep Boys manager went to re-install the plates he discovered this, and then discovered that he didn't have any screws that would work. The last delay was a quick trip to a parts store for six screws to get me on the road again (without having to explain to some policeman why I'm driving without any plates on).

Somewhere above, I mentioned having a hard time grasping that the old door would have to be cut away.

Well ...
That's the old door. I didn't pick the best angle to show that, at the edge of the door, a vertical cut was made, along with two horizontal cuts, to allow folding back a piece of metal the size of a small notebook so they could get at the lock mechanism which had been twisted by the impact.

Here's the car with the replacement door ...
Well, HELL!!! I was just getting reconciled to the idea that the door would be red. Apparently they had to go with another door instead. But it works just fine. Also, the replacement wheel they found is black, instead of the silver of the other wheels. Oh, the humanity!

But, before taking them to task, remember this. Because I'm so damned cheap (out of necessity), I had asked them to just concentrate on functionality;  getting it where I could once again have something to drive.

And, that they delivered on. In spades. It still has battle scars, but, boy does it run!!! As soon as I was driving it again, I lost all of my apprehension over the gamble I had taken on electing to salvage this instead of going for another used car.

So, what was the bottom line on this?

Operation                                      Parts         Labor   Other
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steering/Suspension evaluation                  0.00         19.99    0.00
Replace driver's side door                    342.25 (Used) 321.00    0.00
Replace left rear tire - mount, balance, etc.  56.99         10.49    0.00
Valve stem, tire handling charge (disposal)     6.24          0.00    0.00
Replace left rear lower control arm           102.93        127.40    0.00
Replace left rear trailing arm                412.63        245.00    0.00
PEPGUARD LIMITED EXTENDED LABOR WARRANTY        0.00          0.00   55.86
Shop Fee (Miscellaneous supplies)               0.00          0.00   35.00
Remove and replace door mirrors   (2 x 41.99)  83.98         74.90    0.00
Computerized wheel alignment                    0.00         79.99    0.00
14 inch steel wheel                           101.25          0.00    0.00
Left door latch                                82.39          0.00    0.00
Silicon lubricant                              12.32          0.00    0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals                                       1200.98        878.77   90.86
Sub-Total: 2170.61
Tax:        101.97
------------------
TOTAL:     2272.58

Up above, in earlier updates, I asterisked out a lot of names because this was an open claim and I had yet to see how things would go.

As everyone involved has done right by me and helped me enormously they deserve to be acknowledged.

To State Farm insurance agent Scott McNab and his team here in Houston, to State Farm claims adjuster Stacey Sutton and her team in Dallas, and especially to manager Mike McCrary and his fantastic team at
 Pep Boys Automotive Supercenter #1487
 4141 Greenbriar St, Houston, TX 77098
 (713) 528-8811 ...

To once again be able to go where I wish, when I wish, in a reasonable amount of time and not arriving soaked in sweat and on the verge of collapse, well, what you folks have restored to me is nothing less than life itself.

You done good!

Phoenix
 Although not from ashes,
 this is still a true rebirth;
 for car, and myself.

(Not a true haiku,
 needing a season somewhere;
 I'm a TEXAN!!!  'Kay? :-)
-

Does anything more ...

... really need saying?
(From theblaze.com)

Didn't think so.

But, I'll add something anyway. From Finally: The Obama Spangled Banner ...
  The final insult to veterans? The flag is made in China.

-

Monday, March 12, 2012

NOT Safe For Work ...

... because you can lose yourself all day in this, really endearing yourself to your boss. :-)

Today's Astronomy Picture of the Day
   ( http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120312.html ) ...

The Scale of the Universe - Interactive
Flash Animation Credit & Copyright:
Cary & Michael Huang

... a modern version of the classic video Powers of Ten, is a new window to many of the known scales of our universe. By moving the scroll bar across the bottom, you can explore a diversity of sizes, while clicking on different items will bring up descriptive information.

This is an incredible interactive Flash video, and if I can load and run it on my antique dial-up connection, most of you should have no problems at all.

Click on the music note in the upper right corner for a very nice (and appropriate) piece of background music.

It ranges through 43 63 orders of magnitude (be sure to go to both ends of the scroll bar).

Enjoy - and don't forget; I warned you. :-)
-

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Schadenfreude ...

... over the new movie John Carter (2012).

The title of this post (pronounced shahd-in-froid-uh, as near as I can tell) is a German word meaning "pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others".

This post is not a review of the movie itself (which I found to be pretty damn good), but of the nearly insane reactions of some people to it.

First, there were the gripes about it being a rip-off of Star Wars (1977) and Avatar (2009), although in fact it's based on stories written a full century ago by Edgar Rice Burroughs (who would later conjure up Tarzan), and those later movies actually owe a lot to those stories.

Then, there was the nit-picking over the title.  For a long time, "John Carter of Mars" was a dream project for many who wanted to see the stories brought to life.  When Disney announced the upcoming movie would simply be called  "John Carter", the screams could be heard for miles.

Ok, then. How about that title?

Burroughs' first (as yet untitled) novel, featuring John Carter as the leading character, was written in mid-to-late 1911 and serialized in a magazine (as "Under the Moons of Mars") in 1912. It didn't get published as a novel until after Burroughs became a success with his Tarzan series. In 1917, for a hardcover edition, the title was changed to "A Princess of Mars".

Ten more books were written in the John Carter series;  the eleventh (and final) installment having the title of "John Carter of Mars". So the purists were up in arms over Disney apparently dropping "of Mars" from the title, even though that was never the title of the book that opened the series in the first place.

The movie posters and previews simply say "John Carter".  A few minutes into the movie, the opening title just says "John Carter". BUT, the end title of the movie, just before the credits, appears as "John Carter", immediately followed below it by "of Mars". I do not believe for a second that this is a gimmick, nor a last-minute appeasement to the gripers, but that it is an integral part of the story.

John Carter was a former Confederate cavalry officer who got transported (by some form of astral projection in the novel, and by an alien device in the movie) to Mars, and while caught up in events there, was naturally obsessed with finding a way to get back to where he belonged. The bit with the opening and end titles reflects his evolution into realizing that his new home is where he now belongs and that he truly is "of Mars".

Thirdly, when you hear that a movie is reputed to cost a ton of money, you can count on the knives coming out.  This one is estimated to have cost around $250 million.  Well, so what?!!!  That's peanuts these days.  Have you noticed the prices of everything else lately?

James Cameron has been down that road twice. I got hooked on the internet in the late '90s and movie newsgroups were some of my favorite fare. In those groups, for a solid year before the release of Titanic (1997), its reputed budget of $200 million had large numbers of commenters predicting disaster and bankruptcy for Twentieth Century Fox and Paramount Studios.

What struck me then (and still does) is the absolute glee with which they made those predictions, seeming to want so desperately for that man to fail.  And then, he proved them wrong when Titanic proceeded to make more money worldwide than almost anything else in movie history. That was unforgivable.  Hell hath no fury like a detractor proven completely wrong.

Twelve years later, to really rub it in, he did it again with Avatar (2009). Same issue (costing boatloads of money), same gleeful predictions of disaster, and same result (making more money than the GNP of some small nations).

Also similar in result was the pure vile hatred from some of the commenters over his success. There must be psychiatric wards filled with his detractors over his stubborn refusal to just fall down.

Now, whether Andrew Stanton (the director of "John Carter") will have a similar experience to Cameron's has yet to be determined. This is his first live-action feature. His previous films were animated (Disney/Pixar's "Finding Nemo" and "Wall-E").

I suspect that his work in animation was excellent practice for pre-visualizing a story and having a pretty good idea of just where he was going to go with it.  While not perfect by a long shot, it is superb, very enjoyable and a damned fine first live-action effort. But, he may have to face the same storm of furies that Cameron has had to put up with, especially if "John Carter" turns out to be a box-office success.

Trying to explain that bitterness (envy?) directed to some (Cameron attracts it like a lightning rod, as does Steven Spielberg and perhaps Stanton will also, but George Lucas appears to have been spared much of that) who succeed in creating and delivering something truly remarkable, was the whole point of this post in the first place (and why I chose that title).

But, I fear that may be way beyond my pay grade. It's probably more within the purview of a professional psychiatrist like Dr. Sanity.  She might have her work cut out for her on this one.

Bottom line on "John Carter", in this not-really-a-movie-review: Pretty damn good!

-

Sunday, February 26, 2012

"Fool me once, shame on you ...

... Fool me twice, shame on me!"  ~(Ancient Chinese proverb).

Fool me THREE TIMES?!!!

Good God!!! - That should result in forehead meets desk violently.

I've already put up two posts on email scams (Scam, and Another email scam - a bit more dangerous.)

I opened an email yesterday morning, that appeared to be from a blogger with whom I correspond.

I was dumb enough to click on a link in it, without thinking that his "Take this one very seriously" message was just not the way he writes.

It opened up a window on my browser to a site for one of those "Work at home" schemes, and then I noticed that it opened up another window to the same site.

Attempts to close either window produced a pop-up widget wanting me to click on a button to navigate away from the window.

That's when I thought, "OH, SH*T!!!"

I used the Task Manager to shut down the windows, logged off, and began a system scan for viruses. A check on the "Event Report" of my Panda anti-virus and firewall software showed that a connection attempt had been blocked by it at the time I had stupidly clicked on that link.

While the scan was still running, I sent an email to the folks that I usually send my "Look at me! Look at me!!" messages to, warning ...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most likely, that blogger's email account got hijacked for a bunch of email addresses to send that thing to, and that was probably what was intended if the connection on MY machine hadn't been blocked by the firewall.

But, just in case, you'll notice no links or attachments whatever in this email. (If you get your email on Yahoo, or a similar web service, you might see a couple of attachments. - That's normal. They're data files with formatting info; you'll find them on ALL of your email in those systems.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also alerted that blogger, who at that time was apparently already aware of it, and dealing with it.

At present, it appears that everything is Ok, and that Panda did exactly what it was meant to do and prevented hijacking of my email information.

It was probably something like this that caused the events described in Scam, but I'm confident enough of my firewall to go back to my normal email format, links and all. I do not believe that you are likely to get any counterfeit messages purporting to be from me.

All the same however, a good antivirus and firewall is a worthy piece of insurance.

I'm beginning to learn that using a computer when you're half asleep can be as dangerous as driving in that condition.

So, how did I end up with Panda as my antivirus program?

I got this computer at the end of 2003, when I knew my job was going to be outsourced three months down the line and I felt I needed to replace an eight-year old machine as I would be searching online a lot, while futilely looking for a new job in my sixties.

It came with Norton antivirus installed, and I stayed with it and updated it (If it ain't broke, don't fix it!) until a couple of years ago when they no longer supported the version I had. So, I would have to buy a newer version and discovered that, as with most software, upgrades can be expensive and usually want more memory (more, in fact, than I had).

Therefore, I looked at alternatives.

Panda (from Panda Security, in Bilbao, Spain) had a very good reputation, was  reasonably priced (including a firewall) and not such a memory hog (getting along just fine with 128 Mb if you don't turn on one of their special (but not really essential) features that requires 512 Mb minimum memory - I only have 256 Mb).

If you already have an antivirus and firewall that does the job, excellent. No reason not to stay with it.

But, if circumstances (like mine) force you to consider an alternative, I absolutely recommend them.

I had used them, on my previous machine, replacing already installed software for similar reasons as mentioned above.  At that time, I had problems installing it because of conflicts with the existing software and leftover files from same.

This time (on my current computer), before installing it, I looked up and noted every directory I could find that appeared exclusively associated (very, very important) with the existing Norton software, then ran the "Uninstalls" for it and afterwards cleaned out and deleted any of those directories that the uninstall process may have missed. As a result, this time, the Panda installation was more straightforward and uneventful.

FYI - Your mileage may vary. :-)

(What IS it about Bilbao, Spain?  My bank is now owned by a group there. For years, I've used Compass Bank, long a major banking association in the Sunbelt.  In 2007, it became BBVA Compass, and NO, that doesn't mean Better Business of Virginia or anything like that. It means Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, who bought it out then. (Trivia, having absolutely no relevance to the post at hand.))
-

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Another email scam - a bit more dangerous

-Would you like a virus with that?

I did something really stupid, as I DO know better.

This time, I was lucky.

Got a strange email, warning that my status as a Certified Public Accountant was in jeopardy, over helping my employees file fraudulent income tax returns.

Now this was news to me that I even had a status as a CPA and that I had employees.

The email wanted me to respond to the complaint (a linked PDF file). It also had a link to view the thing in a browser if necessary.

The "lucky" part was that I got the email late last night, and as I had to go to bed for an early rising in the morning for work, I moved the email to a special folder to deal with later.

So, it was almost an entire day before I got around to it.

Now, the true stupidity begins ...

I actually clicked on the "Complaint.pdf" link, and got ...
   403 - Access forbidden

Next, I clicked on "View it in your browser", getting ...
   404 - Page not found

That turned out to be a very good thing.

I then did what I should have done in the first place.

I googled for American Instutute of CPAs (the outfit that the email was supposedly from), went to their website (www.aicpa.org) to find contact information to verify that the email was legitimate, and the first thing I see on their main page (under "Other News") was a link to Alert: Fraudulent "Phishing" Scam Email Not from AICPA

Clicking on that link disclosed ...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thursday February 16, 2012, the AICPA became aware of a fraudulent email phishing scam using an AICPA banner and referencing the recipient’s possible involvement in an unlawful income tax refund activity that was sent to numerous individuals, CPAs, non-CPAs and members of the general public.

Messages may appear to come from senders such as the AICPA, Southwest Airlines, American Airlines or other well known sources including the Better Business Bureau.

This email is not from the AICPA nor from the AICPA database.
Do not open any attachment or click on any link as the email may contain a virus. While the exact source has not yet been determined, we are actively investigating the situation.

On Friday, February 17, the Better Business Bureau reported that a new round of phishing scams is using a BBB.org email address along with the American Institute of CPAs logo and name. The message informs recipients that their CPA license is being terminated due to tax fraud allegations and encourages them to click on a link and reply to the charges. The link leads to a third party website that downloads a virus on to the recipient’s computer. (Emphasis Mine)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh, Great!!!  I've just spent the last four hours running a full system scan on my computer, fortunately finding nothing (those error messages I got probably meant that they were able to de-fang those links by the time I had tried to access them).

As I said, pure luck this time.

The damned thing really did look legitimate and I figured they just had the wrong information.  Nevertheless, that google check I made should have been my first response if I had thought there was anything that needed replying to.

To the best of my knowledge, no legitimate outfit or agency is going to send such news as an email.  If it's truly serious, they would more likely employ regular (USPS) mail, maybe even Certified Mail to be sure that you actually got it.

If they want you to click on a link, use a lot more sense than I did and let that request ring all sorts of alarm bells in your head.  Again, no legitimate outfit will ask you to do that.

I was extremely tired and made a mistake.  Well, tired people can get killed by the mistakes they make, so watch out.  It's a snake's nest out there.

Have a good 'un.
-

Thursday, February 16, 2012

“The French have a phrase for it ...

...The bastards have a phrase for everything and they are always right.
   To say goodbye is to die a little.”
     ~Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye (1953)

I had considered naming this post "Moving on" or "To absent friends ..." but, while I liked the punch of the latter, I have no reason to believe any of them dead, so it didn't seem appropriate.

Those of you who usually receive my cast of thousands (Ok;  a couple of dozen then :-) email notices may notice a few names missing from the mailing list.

Friendships and relationships do not always last forever; circumstances (in a word - LIFE) intrudes and entropy will have its say.

Sometimes, the true miracle is what does last.  In the mid '70s, by purest accident I ran into an Air Force buddy I hadn't seen in 13 years.  I didn't even recognize him at first, wondering if he might be an architect client of the engineering company I worked for then.  But he knew me right away, at least enough to inquire if I was Paul Binkley (my name when I was in the USAF).

He gave me his telephone number and asked me to give him a call.

I dithered about that for awhile (probably most of you have had the experience of running into someone you knew long ago and then finding that so much has changed since then that you no longer have anything in common anymore), but finally found the courage to do so and am so glad that I did.

I went to see him and his family (including a six or seven year old son that I felt like I was almost an honorary uncle to.  He turned out all right, and I'd sure like to think that I was a decent influence).

In this case, my friend and I reconnected almost at once.  Some years later, I even moved out of state (to Mt. Pleasant, Michigan)  and worked for him as a data-processing manager, until he had to let me go (partly economic circumstances, partly my own failing - management was not my greatest strength; I was much better at playing with the computers).

Some of my other Air Force friends, upon reading this, will probably rag on him a little bit, "You FIRED Him?!!!"  Well, give him a break.  Under the circumstances, I don't see that he had any other choice.  We're still good friends, even though he's been seduced by the Dark Side and is now a lawyer :(.  He even reads my blog once in a while.

E-mail communications don't get very wordy though.  In that he shares a trait with the other Air Force buddies of mine, in that long-winded conversations just aren't their thing.  He's perfectly capable of replying in an email, to a long and detailed question, "Yep!"  (Strangely, for a group that was a language unit in the USAF, if Clint Eastwood could be described as a man of few words, they would be of even fewer. :-)

With him and most of my other Air Force buddies, that friendship and relationship will likely outlast the lot of us.

But other people have lives of their own and circumstances make it very unlikely that we will ever get together again.  I suspect that for some, occasional purging of superfluous contacts may be necessary for their own sanity, and to cling leech-like to them is simply not fair.

So, as for AK, BW, IC, JC, JG, JV, RC, SB, and TW, they were (and still are) my friends and I wish them all the best. I will never forget them.

But, they have moved on (it's really as simple as that) and it's high time I did so as well.

Bottom line: I think Raymond Chandler pretty well nailed it above.
-

Thursday, February 09, 2012

"Of COURSE, they're naked!!!" ... (Updated 12 Jun 2015 - Rest In Peace)

 - "It's dangerous to jump through a fire with your clothes on!"

Thusly Christopher Lee (as Lord Summerisle) responds (quite reasonably) to an outraged visiting police sergeant, who has stated the obvious while witnessing a pagan ritual dance in The Wicker Man (1973). To be sure, that sergeant will soon find his sensibilities to be the very least of his problems.

My previous post Immortality, a "Happy Birthday" to composer John Williams who turned 80 just yesterday (08 Feb 2012) was an attempt to come to terms with the fact that I'm closing in on 70.

Well, Sir Christopher (born 27 May 1922, who could address John Williams as "Kid" and will hit NINETY just two days after I reach 70), would probably respond to my lamentation with "Stop WHINING!!!"

Although he'd done a lot before, for many of us this was our introduction to Lee ...

Many photos can be found of him in that role, but none that can hold a candle to this portrait from Canadian fan artist presterjohn1.  He captures the very soul.

Lee's IMDB page (linked at the top of this post) lists 274 titles in which he appears, and there are more to come.  Like Michael Caine, he apparently lives to work, and has probably no interest whatever in retiring. (To Sir Christopher: If you ever do contemplate that, my sincere advice is -- Don't!)

That resume goes back to 1946, but it was 12 years later when he first appeared as Dracula in Horror of Dracula (1958), a role he performed eight times, including an Italian-made version, Count Dracula (1970), that was quite faithful to the original novel, and an uncredited appearance in a Jerry Lewis comedy, One More Time (1970) that one of you will have to check out;  from what I've read, that one is probably not going to make it onto my must see list.

In deference to the opening lines and title of this post, I've read many times that Christopher Lee's favorite role is (or was for a long time) ...
Lord Summerisle, in The Wicker Man - from bafta.org

As the leader of a modern day pagan cult, preparing to offer a human sacrifice, Lee is clearly having the time of his life, being so wickedly charming and reasonable.

My personal favorite of his roles is ...
Le Comte de Rochefort in The Three Musketeers
modified from photo at juntajuleil.com

In 1973, director Richard Lester put together the absolutely finest version of The Three Musketeers (1973) I've ever seen.

(He then proceeded to create a firestorm by splitting the movie into two parts, releasing the second part as The Four Musketeers: Milady's Revenge (1974) the following year.  You see, he had learned that theater owners weren't too keen on booking a movie that was over four-hours long, as you get fewer showings that way and don't make as much money.  So, he split it.

BUT, he really should have discussed it with his actors and crew first;  most of whom were a bit less than thrilled to learn that they had made two movies while being paid for one. Lawsuits resulted and things were eventually worked out.)

The movie had a stellar cast, but Lee managed to steal it whenever he showed up.

Athos (Oliver Reed) to D'Artagnan, who had inquired about the man with the eye-patch:
"His name is Rochefort. He's the Cardinal's living blade, and he's deadlyIf you should see him coming down the other side of the road, well, just don't cross over;  that's all."

Years later, another installment was made, The Return of the Musketeers (1989), with Lee, the same director, and most of the same actors, but sadly it was pretty forgettable.

He went up against 007 ...
Christopher Lee as Francisco Scaramanga - from snyderworld.co.cc

... in the Roger Moore James Bond movie The Man With The Golden Gun (1974), and lost of course.  How could he ever have had a chance? :-)

Not my favorite Bond movie by a long shot, nor my favorite Lee performance, it graces this post only because of the trivia that Christopher Lee is a cousin of the late Ian Fleming (the writer who conjured up Bond in the first place).

Now, for an example of making maximum use of limited time ...
Christopher Lee as Blind Pew - modified from photo at starwarped.net

Charlton Heston created perhaps the finest version ever of Treasure Island (1990) as a made-for-TV movie, and populated it with a wonderful cast (he did pretty well with his part as well, considering that Long John Silver is not an easy role, having to be tough enough to control a pirate crew and still manage to be sympathetic to a young boy).

Long available only on VHS tape, late last year it finally came out on DVD (and about damn time too). (Added 25 May 2012 - I have a lot more to say about this version in a later post - Treasure Island.  You can probably gather that I like it a lot.)

It opens with the arrival of Billy Bones, played by the formidable Oliver Reed (never a shrinking violet), but when he is humbled by Blind Pew showing up to deliver the "black spot" and an ultimatum, I'm not at all sure just how much of that is acting;  Lee has a commanding presence and, during the probably less than 10 or 15 minutes of total screen time he has here, totally dominates it.

I'm not going to exhaust the internet's store of photos and info about him. (I doubt I could keep up with him in any case).  Most of you probably already remember him as Count Dooku/Darth Tyranus in the 2nd and 3rd Star Wars prequels, and as Saruman in the Lord of the Rings Trilogy.

I last saw him in Hugo (I mention that movie a bit in my post "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy") and the IMDB page lists (at the moment) five more movies he's working on (including the two Hobbit movies, where he returns as a slightly younger Saruman).

So, what does a guy pushing ninety look like today? ...
From wildsoundmovies.com

Damn! There are people in their sixties (including yours truly) who would surrender their souls to look like that. Life is just so unfair. :(

(And Sir Christopher repeats, yet again, "Stop WHINING!!!" :-)

Update 12 Jun 2015 - Rest In Peace ..
I have learned that, sadly, he passed away on 07 Jun 2015, at the age of 93. The best eulogy I've seen, so far is  Rest In Peace Sir Christopher Lee .

19 APR 2019 - Added THIS ...


Sir: You will be truly missed.
-

Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Immortality

While I whine and moan about approaching 70, this guy reached his 80th birthday today (Wed, 08 Feb 2012) and is still doing his thing;  still being creative.

Happy Birthday, John Williams.


His Imdb page (linked above) lists 139 movies and television shows that he has composed the music for, going back to the mid-50s, including Playhouse 90, M Squad  (a detective series starring Lee Marvin), Wagon Train, Gilligan's Island (Ok! Maybe not the greatest thing on his resume), Lost in Space (what I said just before).

He'd been working almost 30 years when he was picked to do the score for Steven Spielberg's Jaws.  I recall an interview with Spielberg (probably on one of the DVD issues of Jaws) in which he mentioned Williams coming over to his house one evening and playing on his piano what he had in mind for Jaws.

Spielberg confessed that his first reaction to hearing what would become one of the most iconic pieces of music since Bernard Hermann's Pyscho and Henry Mancini's Theme from Peter Gunn was "That's IT?!!!"  Not even Spielberg realized just what he had at the moment.

Williams had already worked with Spielberg before, and then went on to score almost everything from him afterwards.  At present, post-production work is being done on Spielberg's latest (Lincoln) and once again, Williams is doing the score.  I've no doubt at all that the result will be worth watching and hearing.

This kind of longevity is not all that unusual in the arts, especially in classical music.  There are composers (Igor Stravinsky, Ralph Vaughn Williams) and conductors (Leopold Stokowski) that were still doing fresh, original work in their 90s.

The secret almost certainly lies in doing something that you truly love.

(Consider this post as a work-in-progress.  I'm thinking of other examples and will probably either expand it, or do a follow-on.)

-

Sunday, February 05, 2012

What IS it with the Republican Party?!!!

- Some quite lethal things actually. I'm going to address two of them here.

Wed, 10 Apr 2013 - Damned near USELESS!!! - See update at end. :(

"Drunks, passed out in public places, are more truly symbolic of the USSR than is the Hammer & Sickle."    ~Robert A. Heinlein, "Inside Intourist" (1960)

He and his wife Virginia had taken a tour of the Soviet Union in 1960 and he was referring to the Russian proclivity to use vodka (often dosing themselves to unconsciousness), to insulate themselves from the absolutely soul-crushing hopelessness of life under that system.

That could be where we're heading.

Only three years into his first term, Barack Obama has already launched us well on the way. Just think of what he could manage with yet another term.

Sadly, many Republicans seem Hell-bent on making that second term all too likely.

Part 1 - The Circular Firing Squad ...
... and our shark-like feeding frenzies when going after Republican candidates with whom we disagree.  All too many of us appear to have no idea of what "Pyrrhic Victory" actually means.

Unfortunately, the Democrats do seem to understand, and consistently do a much better job of uniting behind the eventual winner of their primaries (or in this case, their virtually unopposed candidate).

"When your enemies are destroying themselves, do not interfere!"

I don't know if that saying goes back to Musashi Miyamoto, Sun Tzu, or even cave paintings, but I'd be very surprised if it's not framed on a wall above David Axelrod's desk.

When the campaigns started, I had wanted, so much, Sarah Palin as our candidate. But, that was not to be.

After her, I'd have preferred Rick Perry. But unfortunately, it appears the thing he's best at is governing. While I believed (and still do) that he would make a truly excellent President, there remains that pesky detail of winning the nomination before you get a chance at going for the job itself.

Next up was Newt Gingrich: A fighter, with an idea-a-second mind and the willingness to actually run against the system currently in place.  But he goes all over the map sometimes, following an excellent South Carolina campaign where he focused on issues, with a badly mistaken Florida campaign where he reverted to "destroy Romney" mode, losing badly as a result.

Roger L. Simon (long a fan of his) tore him a new one in Florida: Why Gingrich Lost Big and What’s Next. While Simon's post is disturbing enough, what absolutely terrifies me are the comments.

It appears that whoever emerges as the nominee, all too many of those against him will throw a tantrum, sit out the election, and then on the first Wednesday this November, will be wailing about what just happened and wondering "Who's responsible?".  Well, in that case, I suggest that you look into a mirror. And, may God Damn you to Hell! Because that's precisely what you will have done to the rest of us.

If any grown-ups remain in the Republican Party, their #1 concern absolutely has to be about getting some kind of unity behind whoever emerges victorious in the primaries, and get him all the support he needs.

Because, the safest bet on earth right now is that the Democrats will turn out in force to be damned sure their candidate makes it.

Or, would you prefer Obama getting a chance to complete the job of turning our country into the despair-ridden Hell that Robert Heinlein visited so long ago (and apparently remains the blueprint of the society Obama's administration wishes to force upon us)?

It is truly up to you.

I wrote those preceding paragraphs, about Roger L. Simon's post and the resulting comments several days ago, in the post that is replaced by this one.

Today (05 Feb 2012), he has a new post on Romney's win in the Nevada Caucus ...
Republican Nomination: The Fat Lady Sings at The Venetian but the Losers Aren’t Listening "To the candidates themselves who treat each other like they were refugees from a leper colony, when their actual views are close to identical, I say take your extreme narcissistic personality disorders and go see a reputable psychiatrist. The country is more important than you are."

... and once again the commentors scare the Hell out of me, making me hope to God they are not truly representative of the electorate, as they totally confirm what I said about them in the preceding paragraphs.
-

Part 2 - Kdaptist Republicans ...
The other problem is that, for an opposition party, all too often we really aren't.

We appear to have a GOP Establishment of insiders for whom the commandment is "Watch thou for the mutant."

If you recall the old Frankenstein movies in which the villagers are coming for the monster with torches and pitchforks, that is the fate of any Republican who dares to be distinguishable from a Democrat.

Do I exaggerate?  Ask Sarah Palin, or Florida Representative Col. Allen West, who's greatest enemy is not a Democratic opponent, but his own party (see Is The Florida Republican Party About To Sacrifice Congressman Allen West)

Now, divisions within our party aren't that new or unusual.  I remember Barry Goldwater's campaign in the '60s, running on the theme of his book, "A Choice; Not an Echo."

I also remember that he lost (although, what would have happened had Kennedy not been assassinated is anyone's guess;  he was in Texas that day to mend political fences -- he was in trouble. Don't forget that while he handled the Cuban Missile Crisis very well, it was his handling of the failed Cuban invasion and the rise of the Berlin Wall that set the stage for the crisis in the first place. He was not invulnerable politically at that time).

It may be that loss that has given us an inner corps of GOP insiders that are terrified of anyone distinguishable from a Democrat.  Indeed, four years later, George Wallace would run as a third-party candidate on the grounds that, of the Democrats and Republicans, "There's not a dime's worth of difference between them!"

Larry Niven wrote about those establishment types in his "Known Space" series
(and I'll bet you thought he was just writing science-fiction :-).  In it, among humankind's greatest adversaries were the Kzinti: eight-foot tall, bipedal, carnivorous cat-like aliens for whom the word aggressive is a masterpiece of English understatement.

After Louis Wu has had to challenge one (who had not yet earned a name, but was referred to by his function: "Speaker" - short for "Speaker to animals"), and an intervention from another Kzin prevented that challenge from reaching its tragic conclusion ...
  Speaker: "Louis: I found your challenge verbose.
  "A simple scream of rage is sufficient.
  "You scream and you leap!"

They had fought us many times, always losing.  In another story, when the possibility of their involvement in some mysterious happening was raised, Beowulf Schaeffer observed, "It's not like they're a real threat;  they'll always attack before they're quite ready."

In the novel "Ringworld", Speaker tells Louis about the "Kdapt-Preacher heresy": The mad Kzin Kdapt-Preacher had his road to Damascus moment and concluded that the Kzinti constantly lost their wars with man because the Creator had, in fact, made Man in his image and favored him.

So, disciples of his cult wore skins and masks made of human skin in hopes of deceiving the Creator and finally managing a victory.

"You kept winning!", Speaker explained.

Or, another example (I swear I'm still on topic here) ...

To the best of my knowledge, the AIDS virus does not harm you directly but does its damage by infiltrating your body's defenses and infecting the white blood cells that are its first line of defense, so that when you come under attack from something else you find that your guardians are on perpetual coffee break.

Are those examples the standards to which the Republican Party aspires to?  To win by only being impostors of the Democrats?

I'm not at all keen on the idea of a third party to split our opposition to Obama, but I'm leaning hard in that direction once the November election is behind us. If the Republicans insist on being only a pale shadow of the Democrats, they are damned near useless.

I've usually been opposed to the idea of term limits, but I'm reconsidering that;  the establishment types described above make a wonderful case for the notion that serving in the Executive or Legislative branch should never be a lifetime profession.

(Originally posted 1234 CST, 05 Feb 2012)

Update - Wed, 11 Apr 2013 - Damned near USELESS!!!
I originally posted this on 05 Feb 2012, and I stand by every word of it.

This item (Taxes, Guns, and Chuck Schumer as GOP Leader) on Redstate today caused me to resurrect my post and bump it to the top.

I'm frankly "Mad as Hell ...", but am not at all sure just what to do about it.  My misgivings about a third party splitting opposition to the democrats still remain, but it may very well have to come to that. My biggest hope is that the Tea Party supporters will work on (and eventually succeed in)  instigating enough of a revolt within the Republican Party to make it worth a damn again.

What I am certain of is that there is no hope in Hell of accomplishing anything useful with a party made up of democrat wannabes.

Revolution within the Republican Party, or total replacement of the party? That, I believe, is the question.
-

Saturday, February 04, 2012

Emergency Only

A status message I sometimes get on my cellphone (TracFone).

As far as I can determine, this happens when I get into an area that appears to be a local "dead zone" (not getting a signal for some reason).  It usually goes back to normal when I move a bit and it gets a signal again.

But, I have to wonder ...

If it's not getting a signal, just how in Hell is it supposed to be of any use in an emergency?!!!

:(

Followers

Stat Counter